DrugPipeline.net has announced the addition of “Global Public Health Partnering 2010-2016: Deal trends, players and financials” research report to their website DrugPipeline.net

Bangalore, Karnataka -- (SBWire) -- 04/27/2016 --Global Public Health Partnering 2010-2016: Deal trends, players and financials provides comprehensive understanding and unprecedented access to the public health partnering deals and agreements entered into by the worlds leading healthcare companies

Description
Global Public Health Partnering 2010 to 2016 provides the full collection of Public Health disease deals signed between the world's pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies since 2010.

Trends in Public Health partnering deals
Financial deal terms for headline, upfront and royalty by stage of development
Public Health partnering agreement structure
Public Health partnering contract documents
Top Public Health deals by value
Most active Public Health dealmakers

Most of the deals included within the report occur when a licensee obtains a right or an option right to license a licensor's product or technology. More often these days these deals tend to be multi-component including both a collaborative R&D and a commercialization of outcomes element.

The report takes readers through the comprehensive Public Health disease deal trends, key players and top deal values allowing the understanding of how, why and under what terms companies are currently entering Public Health deals.

The report presents financial deal terms values for Public Health deals, where available listing by overall headline values, upfront payments, milestones and royalties enabling readers to analyse and benchmark the value of current deals.

The initial chapters of this report provide an orientation of Public Health dealmaking trends.

Chapter 1 provides an introduction to the report.

Chapter 2 provides an overview of the trends in Public Health dealmaking since 2010 covering trends by year, deal type, stage of development, technology type and therapeutic indication.

Chapter 3 includes an analysis of financial deal terms covering headline value, upfront payment, milestone payments and royalty rates.

Chapter 4 provides a review of the leading Public Health deals since 2010. Deals are listed by headline value. The chapter includes the top 25 most active Public Health dealmakers, together with a full listing of deals to which they are a party. Where the deal has an agreement contract published at the SEC a link provides online access to the contract.

Chapter 5 provides comprehensive access to Public Health deals since 2010 where a deal contract is available, providing the user with direct access to contracts as filed with the SEC regulatory authorities. Each deal title links via Weblink to an online version of the deal record contract document, providing easy access to each contract document on demand.

Chapter 6 provides a comprehensive directory of all Public Health partnering deals by specific Public Health target announced since 2010. The chapter is organized by specific Public Health therapeutic target. Each deal title links via Weblink to an online version of the deal record and where available, the contract document, providing easy access to each contract document on demand.

In addition, a comprehensive appendix is provided with each report of all Public Health partnering deals signed and announced since 2010. The appendices are organized by company A-Z, stage of development at signing, deal type (collaborative R&D, co-promotion, licensing etc) and technology type. Each deal title links via Weblink to an online version of the deal record and where available, the contract document, providing easy access to each contract document on demand.

The report also includes numerous tables and figures that illustrate the trends and activities in Public Health partnering and dealmaking since 2010.

In conclusion, this report provides everything a prospective dealmaker needs to know about partnering in the research, development and commercialization of Public Health technologies and products.

Report scope

Global Public Health Partnering 2010 to 2016 is intended to provide the reader with an in-depth understanding and access to Public Health trends and structure of deals entered into by leading companies worldwide.

Global Public Health Partnering 2010 to 2016 includes:

- Trends in Public Health dealmaking in the biopharma industry since 2010
- Analysis of Public Health deal structure
- Access to headline, upfront, milestone and royalty data
- Access to hundreds of Public Health deal contract documents
- Comprehensive access to over 3500 Public Health deal records
- The leading Public Health deals by value since 2010
- Most active Public Health dealmakers since 2010

In Global Public Health Partnering 2010 to 2016, available deals and contracts are listed by:

- Headline value
- Upfront payment value
- Royalty rate value
- Stage of development at signing
- Deal component type
- Technology type
- Specific therapy indication

Each deal title links via Weblink to an online version of the deal record and where available, the contract document, providing easy access to each contract document on demand.

The Global Public Health Partnering 2010-2016 report provides comprehensive access to available deals and contract documents for over 200 public health deals. Analyzing actual contract agreements allows assessment of the following:

- What are the precise rights granted or optioned?
- What is actually granted by the agreement to the partner company?
- What exclusivity is granted?
- What is the payment structure for the deal?
- How are the sales and payments audited?
- What is the deal term?
- How are the key terms of the agreement defined?
- How are IPRs handled and owned?
- Who is responsible for commercialization?
- Who is responsible for development, supply, and manufacture?
- How is confidentiality and publication managed?
- How are disputes to be resolved?
- Under what conditions can the deal be terminated?
- What happens when there is a change of ownership?
- What sublicensing and subcontracting provisions have been agreed?
- Which boilerplate clauses does the company insist upon?
- Which boilerplate clauses appear to differ from partner to partner or deal type to deal type?
- Which jurisdiction does the company insist upon for agreement law?

Benefits
Global Public Health Partnering 2010 to 2016 provides the reader with the following key benefits:

- In-depth understanding of Public Health deal trends since 2010
- Access Public Health deal headline, upfront, milestone and royalty data
- Research hundreds of actual contracts between Public Health partner companies
- Comprehensive access to over 750 links to actual Public Health deals entered into by the world's biopharma companies
- Indepth review of Public Health deals entered into by the top 25 most active dealmakers
- Benchmark the key deal terms companies have agreed in previous deals
- Identify key terms under which companies partner Public Health opportunities
- Uncover companies actively partnering Public Health opportunities

Spanning over 1000 pages "Global Public Health Partnering 2010-2016: Deal trends, players and financials" report covers Introduction, Trends in Public Health dealmaking, Financial deal terms for Public Health partnering, Leading Public Health deals and dealmakers, Public Health contract document directory, Public Health dealmaking by therapeutic target, Appendices.

For more information Visit at: http://www.drugpipeline.net/current-partnering/global-public-health-partnering-2010-2016-deal-trends-players-and-financials

Related Reports:

Global Anthrax Partnering 2010 to 2016; visit - http://www.drugpipeline.net/current-partnering/global-anthrax-partnering-2010-2016

Pharmacyclics Partnering Deals and Alliances 2010 to 2016; visit - http://www.drugpipeline.net/current-partnering/pharmacyclics-partnering-deals-and-alliances-2010-2016

About DrugPipeline.net
DrugPipeline.net is a market research reports distribution platform which hosts research reports from all leading global market research firms related to pharma industry. It also assist decision makers locate the right market research solution from a single place.